Editorial policy

Who reviews our content

Programme pages, articles and learning material are reviewed by the NanoSchool Internal Team, Advisors and Mentors. Mentors are the subject experts who teach each programme.

Accuracy

• Dates, times, fees and seats on programme pages come straight from our booking system. When they change, the page changes.
• We do not publish made-up numbers or testimonials. Figures about NanoSchool (learners, countries, mentors) are stated with the date they apply to; see the fact sheet.
• Facts about science, technology or careers cite a reliable source (government bodies, international organisations or peer-reviewed research), with a list of references on the page.
• A recorded course is listed as available only when its recording is ready to watch.

Use of AI tools

We may use AI tools to help draft or summarise text. A person from the team above reviews every page before it is published and is responsible for it.

Independence

Programme content is decided by NanoSchool and its mentors. Partners and ambassadors who promote NanoSchool do not change what a programme teaches or what a page says.

Corrections

If you find an error, write to [email protected] with the page link. We check every report and correct confirmed errors on the page.

Last reviewed: 15 November 2026.